P-ISSN 2166-2851
E-ISSN 2166-2118
Vol. 3, Issue 2, 2014June 01, 2014 EDT
The Use of Non-Human Animals in Biomedical Research: Can Moral Theology Fill the Gap?
The Use of Non-Human Animals in Biomedical Research: Can Moral Theology Fill the Gap?
Articles in Vol. 3, Issue 2, 2014
Vol. 3, Issue 2, 2014
- Table of Contents, Vol. 3, no. 2. Non-Human AnimalsTable of Contents
- ContributorsList of Contributors
- Catholic Moral Theology and the Moral Status of Non-Human AnimalsJohn BerkmanCelia Dean-Drummond
- From Theologial Speciesism to a Theological Ethology: Where Catholic Moral Theology Needs to GoJohn Berkman
- Animals, Evil, and Family MealsJulie Hanlon Rubio
- The Use of Non-Human Animals in Biomedical Research: Can Moral Theology Fill the Gap?Susan KoppCharles C. Camosy
- Evolutionary Perspectives on Inter-Morality and Inter-Species Relationships Interrogated in the Light of the Rise and Fall of Homo sapiens sapiensCelia Deane-Drummond
- Moral Passions: A Thomistic Interpretation of Moral Emotions in Nonhuman and Human AnimalsJean Porter
- Speaking Theologically of Animal RightsJames E. Helmer
Kopp, Susan, and Charles C. Camosy. 2014. “The Use of Non-Human Animals in Biomedical Research: Can Moral Theology Fill the Gap?” Journal of Moral Theology 3 (2): 54–71.